That’s a very silly argument, because nearly everything would be subjective then
But it’s not, because as I told you, the church is the pillar of truth, so the teachings would be objective
If morality was truly objective, there wouldn’t be thousands of religions and moral systems
If people interpreted them incorrectly, wouldn’t make it suddenly subjective, just means they in corrected it poorly
>>> If morality was truly objective, there wou...
yes. and christians would all agree on the same things but they do not
>>> If people interpreted them incorrectly, wo...
your interpretation is no more correct than any of your other church members' interpretations
at what point do you think your interpretation is incorrect and open to shift views?
Do you agree that truth is objective
So you don’t think that there is the truth?
So then why are you arguing in the first place?
i was never arguing to begin with
Then why do Christians disagree on so many moral issues if their morality is objective?
I don’t mean argument as like a bad thing I just mean a dialogue
What’s the point if truth is subjective?
Because they interpret the teachings poorly
i don't mean argument as a bad thing either but use words correctly. dialogue and argument are not the same thing
buddy, how do you know your interpretations of the teachings are the correct interpretation?
lol o like how you dodged the question
if the teachings were objective wouldn't every christian have the same understanding?
In a perfect world my dear
i didn't dodge any question and it sounds like you are the one who has been treating this dialogue as an argument
Is a dialogue an argument?
an argument is a dialogue but a dialogue is not an argument
But if something is truly objective, it shouldn’t rely on perfect human interpretation to stay consistent the fact that it’s so easily misinterpreted by millions shows it’s not as clear or objective as claimed
you are arguing with us in bad faith, Spear Chucker Destine. and "spear chucker" in your name sounds like it'd be a sin for racism
The claim I was repling to
which claim is that? the cat's claim?
I've watched 2 episodes of doctor who and you two are still at it
no there's a third person now
He means the one about argument and dialogue
shiet if he wants to make definitions subjective have at it. maybe that's why we hasn't understood anything we've said
Or anything you said for that matter
Of course it’s subjective just like every human interpretation of morality, including yours. That’s exactly my point
look how Pluto was once a planet
But the interpretation and application of those facts especially in moral or religious contexts are often subjective. That’s the difference
A fact is a piece of information that can be proven to be true
