It's the logical thing to do to prove ur claims if there is proof. Cuz only negative can come from not doing so. A liar can teach u the wrong thing on purpose for ex and u'd fall for it
It's the logical thing to do to prove ur claims if there is proof. Cuz only negative can come from not doing so. A liar can teach u the wrong thing on purpose for ex and u'd fall for it
Professors don’t just throw out random claims..they reference research, publish papers, and are held accountable by peer review. Academia runs on evidence not vibes
Yes they do. They weren't shown proof in their education. And they blindlt accepted the claims. Now they're doing the same thing with their students. Throwing our random stuff and asking their students to blindly believe it
Professors don’t just guess they’ve studied the evidence. Students get basics first, then dig deeper to question and verify
No they haven't. Cuz the evidence is presented, for the second time
We might have to agree to disagree
I guess so
great convo tho 👌
Yes sir
No those things aren't referenced in the textbooks
Mēs izmantojam sīkdatnes, lai nodrošinātu tev vienmērīgu pārlūkošanas pieredzi. Mēs nerādām reklāmas un saglabājam tavu pieredzi pseidonīmu.
